Congressional recess in peril after spending measure defeated

STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • NEW: Speaker Boehner insists “there is no threat of a government shutdown”
  • The temporary spending plan would fund the government through November 18
  • A congressional recess next week might be delayed
  • Democrats and Republicans differ on emergency funding for disaster relief

Washington (CNN) — A delayed or canceled recess for Congress loomed Thursday after the House defeated a temporary spending measure the night before that would fund the government for the first seven weeks of the fiscal year that begins October 1.

With a one-week congressional recess scheduled to begin Friday, House Republican leaders warned of a possible weekend session to continue work on the funding plan, known as a continuing resolution.

However, Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, insisted to reporters that an agreement would be reached and the spending measure passed to prevent a possible partial government shutdown when the current fiscal year ends on September 30.

“There is no threat of a government shutdown. Let’s just get this out there,” Boehner said, later adding: “We are going to meet with our members later on today and present some options and decide on a way forward.”

The Democratic-controlled Senate differs with the House on additional emergency money the measure would provide for disaster relief in the wake of Hurricane Irene, Tropical Storm Lee, wildfires and tornadoes this year.

In particular, the two parties disagree over a demand by House Republicans that some of the additional money for depleted disaster relief funding be offset by spending cuts elsewhere.

Failure by Congress to pass the measure would mean a partial government shutdown at midnight September 30. However, the political fallout of such an impasse with a public already angered by congressional stalemate as an election year approaches makes a shutdown unlikely.

The House vote Wednesday was 195-230, with 48 Republicans joining all but a handful of minority Democrats in opposing the short-term spending plan. Minutes later, House Republican leaders met in Boehner’s office to consider revisions to the measure.

In a message to House members, Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s office said the temporary spending plan could come up again Thursday and “members are advised that a weekend session is now possible.”

Asked about the possibility of a weekend session, Boehner said Thursday: “I surely hope not.”

Options under consideration for House Republican leaders included removing or changing the spending offsets opposed by Democrats, or reducing the total amount of spending to appease conservative Republicans. Most of the 48 Republicans who voted no Wednesday are conservatives who think the overall spending level in the measure is too high.

The failed vote was a second rebuke of Boehner and the House Republican leadership by members elected to Congress last year with the support of the conservative tea party movement to give the GOP majority control. During the debt ceiling debate in July, Boehner had to withdraw his own plan for deficit reduction at one point when it became clear he lacked sufficient support within his caucus to get it passed.

This time, the speaker threatened members with pulling them from committee assignments if they failed to support the continuing resolution on Wednesday, according to a Republican source who attended the GOP conference meeting.

The source, speaking on condition of not being identified, said Boehner “cracked the whip” at the Wednesday morning meeting and told Republicans bluntly they needed to back the measure or he’d go to the steering committee and start pulling committee assignments for members who didn’t vote for it. The Republican steering committee approves member committee assignments.

On Thursday, Boehner shrugged off the defeat as the price of trying to get legislation through the democratic process.

“I have no fear in allowing the House to work its will,” he said, adding: “Does it make my life a little more difficult? Yes it does.”

Rep. Bill Huizenga of Michigan, a conservative freshman Republican who opposed the resolution, said removing the offset provision — as Democrats want — would be “more problematic for me and probably for more of the caucus.”

Asked if he was concerned about Boehner’s threat to take away committee posts, Huizenga said: “It’s far less of a concern than going back home and not being able to explain my vote.”

The continuing resolution, which would fund government agencies through November 18, would allocate fewer resources to the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers for disaster response than approved by the Senate last week.

Additional funds are needed because the string of disasters this year has depleted the FEMA and Army Corps of Engineers coffers supporting recovery and rebuilding efforts.

The House measure included a total of $3.6 billion in disaster relief money — $1 billion in emergency funds available when the bill is enacted and another $2.6 billion to be budgeted for those federal response agencies for the 2012 fiscal year that begins October 1.

In addition, House Republican leaders are insisting that the $1 billion in immediate disaster funding be offset with $1.5 billion in cuts to a loan program that helps automakers retool their operations to make more fuel-efficient cars.

Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland, the chamber’s No. 2 Democrat, said his party would support the measure if the offset provision were removed, as did Rep. Norm Dicks of Washington, the ranking Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee.

During floor debate on the measure, Hoyer and other Democrats complained that any kind of offset would be unprecedented for emergency funding to help Americans in need.

“Even if they had the best offset in the world, I still think it’s wrong” to require equivalent spending cuts when getting money to disaster victims, said House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-California.

Conservative Republicans argued that the nation’s expanding deficits require as much spending restraint as possible.

“We’re trying to affect change in a way that we spend taxpayer dollars. That’s what this whole thing is about,” Cantor, R-Virginia, said Wednesday night. “No one is denying anyone disaster aid if they need it, and we’re trying to be responsible and to do the right thing.”

However, the inability of Cantor and the rest of the Republican leadership to push through the resolution showed the unstable politics at play. Democrats were nearly united in opposing the plan, meaning the Republicans couldn’t afford the 48 defections from their ranks.

For Boehner, voting against the Republican resolution amounted, in essence, to “voting to spend more money” in the end, he said Thursday.

Earlier this month, President Barack Obama asked Congress for a total of $5.1 billion in additional disaster aid, $500 million of which was for immediate relief.

Last week, the Senate passed a measure with bipartisan support that would provide $6.9 billion for FEMA and other federal agencies, to be used both for immediate disaster relief as well as in the new fiscal year. The Senate version required no spending offsets.

To Hoyer, the defeat of the GOP measure in the House “says that we are continuing to struggle to do things in a bipartisan fashion.”

If House Republicans “expect our votes, they have to work with us,” he said. “They can’t just give us something and say … their way or the highway.”

“They’ve shown that they can’t govern,” Rep. Steve Israel, D-New York, said of the House Republicans. “We could work this out with them in the spirit of bipartisanship, but they cannot work it out with themselves.”

CNN’s Ted Barrett, Deirdre Walsh and Kate Bolduan contributed to this report.

Washington (CNN) — A delayed or canceled recess for Congress loomed Thursday after the House defeated a temporary spending measure the night before that would fund the government for the first seven weeks of the fiscal year that begins October 1.

With a one-week congressional recess scheduled to begin Friday, House Republican leaders warned of a possible weekend session to continue work on the funding plan, known as a continuing resolution.

However, Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, insisted to reporters that an agreement would be reached and the spending measure passed to prevent a possible partial government shutdown when the current fiscal year ends on September 30.

“There is no threat of a government shutdown. Let’s just get this out there,” Boehner said, later adding: “We are going to meet with our members later on today and present some options and decide on a way forward.”

The Democratic-controlled Senate differs with the House on additional emergency money the measure would provide for disaster relief in the wake of Hurricane Irene, Tropical Storm Lee, wildfires and tornadoes this year.

In particular, the two parties disagree over a demand by House Republicans that some of the additional money for depleted disaster relief funding be offset by spending cuts elsewhere.

Failure by Congress to pass the measure would mean a partial government shutdown at midnight September 30. However, the political fallout of such an impasse with a public already angered by congressional stalemate as an election year approaches makes a shutdown unlikely.

The House vote Wednesday was 195-230, with 48 Republicans joining all but a handful of minority Democrats in opposing the short-term spending plan. Minutes later, House Republican leaders met in Boehner’s office to consider revisions to the measure.

In a message to House members, Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s office said the temporary spending plan could come up again Thursday and “members are advised that a weekend session is now possible.”

Asked about the possibility of a weekend session, Boehner said Thursday: “I surely hope not.”

Options under consideration for House Republican leaders included removing or changing the spending offsets opposed by Democrats, or reducing the total amount of spending to appease conservative Republicans. Most of the 48 Republicans who voted no Wednesday are conservatives who think the overall spending level in the measure is too high.

The failed vote was a second rebuke of Boehner and the House Republican leadership by members elected to Congress last year with the support of the conservative tea party movement to give the GOP majority control. During the debt ceiling debate in July, Boehner had to withdraw his own plan for deficit reduction at one point when it became clear he lacked sufficient support within his caucus to get it passed.

This time, the speaker threatened members with pulling them from committee assignments if they failed to support the continuing resolution on Wednesday, according to a Republican source who attended the GOP conference meeting.

The source, speaking on condition of not being identified, said Boehner “cracked the whip” at the Wednesday morning meeting and told Republicans bluntly they needed to back the measure or he’d go to the steering committee and start pulling committee assignments for members who didn’t vote for it. The Republican steering committee approves member committee assignments.

On Thursday, Boehner shrugged off the defeat as the price of trying to get legislation through the democratic process.

“I have no fear in allowing the House to work its will,” he said, adding: “Does it make my life a little more difficult? Yes it does.”

Rep. Bill Huizenga of Michigan, a conservative freshman Republican who opposed the resolution, said removing the offset provision — as Democrats want — would be “more problematic for me and probably for more of the caucus.”

Asked if he was concerned about Boehner’s threat to take away committee posts, Huizenga said: “It’s far less of a concern than going back home and not being able to explain my vote.”

The continuing resolution, which would fund government agencies through November 18, would allocate fewer resources to the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers for disaster response than approved by the Senate last week.

Additional funds are needed because the string of disasters this year has depleted the FEMA and Army Corps of Engineers coffers supporting recovery and rebuilding efforts.

The House measure included a total of $3.6 billion in disaster relief money — $1 billion in emergency funds available when the bill is enacted and another $2.6 billion to be budgeted for those federal response agencies for the 2012 fiscal year that begins October 1.

In addition, House Republican leaders are insisting that the $1 billion in immediate disaster funding be offset with $1.5 billion in cuts to a loan program that helps automakers retool their operations to make more fuel-efficient cars.

Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland, the chamber’s No. 2 Democrat, said his party would support the measure if the offset provision were removed, as did Rep. Norm Dicks of Washington, the ranking Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee.

During floor debate on the measure, Hoyer and other Democrats complained that any kind of offset would be unprecedented for emergency funding to help Americans in need.

“Even if they had the best offset in the world, I still think it’s wrong” to require equivalent spending cuts when getting money to disaster victims, said House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-California.

Conservative Republicans argued that the nation’s expanding deficits require as much spending restraint as possible.

“We’re trying to affect change in a way that we spend taxpayer dollars. That’s what this whole thing is about,” Cantor, R-Virginia, said Wednesday night. “No one is denying anyone disaster aid if they need it, and we’re trying to be responsible and to do the right thing.”

However, the inability of Cantor and the rest of the Republican leadership to push through the resolution showed the unstable politics at play. Democrats were nearly united in opposing the plan, meaning the Republicans couldn’t afford the 48 defections from their ranks.

For Boehner, voting against the Republican resolution amounted, in essence, to “voting to spend more money” in the end, he said Thursday.

Earlier this month, President Barack Obama asked Congress for a total of $5.1 billion in additional disaster aid, $500 million of which was for immediate relief.

Last week, the Senate passed a measure with bipartisan support that would provide $6.9 billion for FEMA and other federal agencies, to be used both for immediate disaster relief as well as in the new fiscal year. The Senate version required no spending offsets.

To Hoyer, the defeat of the GOP measure in the House “says that we are continuing to struggle to do things in a bipartisan fashion.”

If House Republicans “expect our votes, they have to work with us,” he said. “They can’t just give us something and say … their way or the highway.”

“They’ve shown that they can’t govern,” Rep. Steve Israel, D-New York, said of the House Republicans. “We could work this out with them in the spirit of bipartisanship, but they cannot work it out with themselves.”

CNN’s Ted Barrett, Deirdre Walsh and Kate Bolduan contributed to this report.

Source Blucigs

Advertisements

About crawlnet

internet lover
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s